Abstract

Scattering methods make it possible to compute the effects of renormalized quantum fluctuations on classical field configurations. As a classic example of a topologically nontrivial classical solution, the Abrikosov-Nielsen-Olesen vortex in U(1) Higgs-gauge theory provides an ideal case in which to apply these methods. While physically measurable gauge-invariant quantities are always well-behaved, the topological properties of this solution give rise to singularities in gauge-variant quantities used in the scattering problem. In this paper we show how modifications of the standard scattering approach are necessary to maintain gauge invariance within a tractable calculation. We apply this technique to the vortex energy calculation in a simplified model, and show that to obtain accurate results requires an unexpectedly extensive numerical calculation, beyond what has been used in previous work.

Highlights

  • Topological vortex configurations appear in many field theory models in the form of axially symmetric U(1) vector potentials pointing in azimuthal direction

  • 1Department of Physics, Middlebury College Middlebury, Vermont 05753, USA 2Institute for Theoretical Physics, Physics Department, Stellenbosch University, Matieland 7602, South Africa (Received 4 February 2020; accepted 17 March 2020; published 7 April 2020). Scattering methods make it possible to compute the effects of renormalized quantum fluctuations on classical field configurations

  • While physically measurable gauge-invariant quantities are always well behaved, the topological properties of this solution give rise to singularities in gauge-variant quantities used in the scattering problem

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Topological vortex configurations appear in many field theory models in the form of axially symmetric U(1) vector potentials pointing in azimuthal direction. Physically measurable quantities remain well defined, in these models the field profiles, which depend on the gauge choice, necessarily have a singular structure This structure hampers many computations that go beyond the (static) mean-field approach, the quantum correction to the classical static energy density per unit length. Calculations of the VPE often use auxiliary quantities like Feynman diagrams and/or expansion schemes for scattering data [1] These quantities are not necessarily gauge invariant and the singular structure matters. The quantum fluctuations propagate in a combined potential generated by both the gauge and scalar field backgrounds The latter provides the dominant contribution, but the correct identification and renormalization of the ultraviolet divergences requires a detailed analysis of the interaction with the vortex background. × ηlðρÞ 1⁄4 0; ð5Þ with the dispersion relation ω2 1⁄4 k2 þ m2 and the abbreviation

H ðρÞ ðf2H ðρÞ
SCATTERING DATA AND VACUUM POLARIZATION ENERGY
H ηl with
STANDARD TREATMENT FOR REGULAR VECTOR POTENTIALS
H ηðl1Þ : ð11Þ
FOURIER TRANSFORMS AND FEYNMAN DIAGRAMS
D Λ2 þZm2
SINGULAR BACKGROUND
NUMERICAL EXPERIMENTS
VIII. SUMMARY AND OUTLOOK
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call