Abstract

The fraction 1 capsular protein (F1) is considered an important but not essential virulence factor unique to Y. pestis (Welkos et al., 1995). Immunization with the F1 protein has been shown to protect mice against subcutaneous challenge with wild type Y. pestis (Andrews et al., 1996) and a combined formulation containing F1 and V antigen confers protection against airborne infection (Williamson et al., 1997). The protein has been associated with eliciting protective immune response in humans as well. The observation that genetic immunization is able to elicit a protective immunity has fostered a new generation in vaccine development. The caf1 gene, which codes for the F1 protein, was previously used as DNA vaccine. In this study inbred mice were found to be non responsive, and outbred mice responded by a weak anamnestic response (Brandler et al., 1998). The advent in genetic vaccination and the accumulating information on factors modulating the extent of response to DNA vaccines led us to re-examine genetic vaccination based on F1 antigen. Here we compare three F1 DNA derivatives carrying different signals for cellular localization and demonstrate that one such genetic derivative, which presumably targets expression to the cytosol induces an effective antibody response and confers protection against high doses of infective Y. pestis.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call