Abstract

Simple SummaryMany pathogens exploit the olfactory route to reach critical organs in the body such as the brain or lungs. Thus, effective onset of an early innate immune response in the nasal epithelium is key to stopping pathogen progression. The stimulation of nasal immunity by vaccines may depend on the type of vaccine and vaccination route. The goal of this study was to evaluate the ability of a live attenuated viral vaccine to stimulate innate immunity in the olfactory organ of rainbow trout, a teleost fish of commercial aquaculture value. The kinetics and magnitude of the innate immune response depended on the route of vaccination, with the strongest and fastest responses recorded in intranasally vaccinated fish. Injection vaccination had an intermediate effect, whereas immersion vaccination resulted in delayed and weak nasal innate immunity. Injection vaccination, even with the vehicle control, induced mortality in fingerlings, whereas nasal and immersion vaccines were safe. Challenge experiments with the live virus revealed that nasal and injected vaccines conferred very high and comparable levels of protection, but immersion vaccination only induced transient protection. In conclusion, the route of vaccination determines the type, magnitude and velocity of the innate immune response in the nasal epithelium of animals.Many pathogens infect animal hosts via the nasal route. Thus, understanding how vaccination stimulates early nasal immune responses is critical for animal and human health. Vaccination is the most effective method to prevent disease outbreaks in farmed fish. Nasal vaccination induces strong innate and adaptive immune responses in rainbow trout and was shown to be highly effective against infectious hematopoietic necrosis (IHN). However, direct comparisons between intranasal, injection and immersion vaccination routes have not been conducted in any fish species. Moreover, whether injection or immersion routes induce nasal innate immune responses is unknown. The goal of this study is to compare the effects of three different vaccine delivery routes, including intranasal (IN), intramuscular (i.m.) injection and immersion (imm) routes on the trout nasal innate immune response. Expression analyses of 13 immune-related genes in trout nasopharynx-associated lymphoid tissue (NALT), detected significant changes in immune expression in all genes analyzed in response to the three vaccination routes. However, nasal vaccination induced the strongest and fastest changes in innate immune gene expression compared to the other two routes. Challenge experiments 7 days post-vaccination (dpv) show the highest survival rates in the IN- and imm-vaccinated groups. However, survival rates in the imm group were significantly lower than the IN- and i.m.-vaccinated groups 28 dpv. Our results confirm that nasal vaccination of rainbow trout with live attenuated IHNV is highly effective and that the protection conferred by immersion vaccination is transient. These results also demonstrate for the first time that immersion vaccines stimulate NALT immune responses in salmonids.

Highlights

  • Vaccination has become the most effective method of preventing infectious diseases in farmed fish [1]

  • We have previously reported that nasal vaccination using a live attenuated Infectious hematopoietic necrosis virus (IHNV) vaccine is highly protective both 7 and 28 days post-vaccination [5]

  • We found no mortality in the IN-vaccinated group after challenge with virulent IHNV, demonstrating once again that nasal delivery in rainbow trout is safe

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Vaccination has become the most effective method of preventing infectious diseases in farmed fish [1]. The ideal vaccine must provide long-term protection at both mucosal barriers and systemic tissues. The stimulation of mucosal immune responses by injection vaccines may be delayed compared to mucosal vaccines [4]. Nasal immunity is key to stopping the progression of neurotropic and respiratory pathogens to other body tissues such as the lower respiratory tract or the central nervous system. Recent studies have identified nasal vaccination as an effective method to control infectious diseases in fish [5,6,7]. Nasal vaccines offer many advantages over other types of vaccines such as: (i) a needle-free delivery system; (ii) the induction of strong local and systemic immune responses; (iii) the need for low amounts of antigen

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call