Abstract

You have accessJournal of UrologyTransplantation/Urolithiasis1 Apr 2014V9-11 ROBOTIC PYELOLITHOTOMY AND URETEROPELVIC JUNCTION REPAIR IN A CROSS FUSED ECTOPIC KIDNEY Robert Brown, Jayram Krishnan, Riccardo Autorino, Humberto Laydner, Homayoun Zargar, Octay Akca, Dinesh Samarasekera, Luis Felipe Brandao, Jihad Kaouk, Georges-Pascal Haber, and Robert Stein Robert BrownRobert Brown More articles by this author , Jayram KrishnanJayram Krishnan More articles by this author , Riccardo AutorinoRiccardo Autorino More articles by this author , Humberto LaydnerHumberto Laydner More articles by this author , Homayoun ZargarHomayoun Zargar More articles by this author , Octay AkcaOctay Akca More articles by this author , Dinesh SamarasekeraDinesh Samarasekera More articles by this author , Luis Felipe BrandaoLuis Felipe Brandao More articles by this author , Jihad KaoukJihad Kaouk More articles by this author , Georges-Pascal HaberGeorges-Pascal Haber More articles by this author , and Robert SteinRobert Stein More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2014.02.2318AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Cross fused renal ectopia is a rare congenital anomaly characterized by unilaterally located fused kidneys. For renal calculous disease in this patient population, shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) has a poor stone clearance rate due to inadequate urinary drainage. Percutaneous access is also difficult due to the intervening spine posteriorly and overlying bowel anteriorly. We report a case of robotic pyelolithotomy and ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) reconstruction in a patient with this anatomic variation. METHODS Our patient is a 46 year-old male with an L-shaped left-sided cross fused kidney. He also had duplication his fused segment with hydronephrosis of the lower pole moiety suggestive of a UPJ obstruction. He presented with a 1.7 cm, a 1.1 cm and a 6 mm stone that had failed treatment with SWL and ureteroscopy. A stent was placed into the lower pole moiety and the patient was placed in a modified flank position with the left side up. All ports were placed in the midline with 2 assistant ports for retraction. The robot was docked perpendicular to the patient. After identifying the cross fused segment, ureterolysis of the lower pole ureter was performed. Laparoscopic ultrasound was used to identify the renal stones. A vertical pyelotomy in the fused lower pole renal pelvis was created and stones were removed. Ultrasound identified the remaining renal stone in the upper pole moiety of the fused segment. A second pyelotomy was created and the final stone was removed. The UPJ of the lower pole moiety was dismembered and the ureter was spatulated. An Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty was then completed over our previously placed ureteral stent and the pyelotomies were closed with 3-0 V-loc suture. RESULTS The patient tolerated the procedure well and was discharged home on post-operative day 3. Our operative time was 331 minutes with an estimated blood loss of 50 mL. His post-operative creatinine level was 0.85 mg/dl and at one-month follow up, his diuretic radionuclide scan demonstrated no evidence of urinary tract obstruction with a T1/2 of 12.9 minutes. CONCLUSIONS Robotic pyelolithotomy with ureteropelvic junction reconstruction can be considered in patients with cross fused ectopia and nephrolithiasis who have failed traditional treatment modalities. © 2014FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 191Issue 4SApril 2014Page: e849-e850 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2014MetricsAuthor Information Robert Brown More articles by this author Jayram Krishnan More articles by this author Riccardo Autorino More articles by this author Humberto Laydner More articles by this author Homayoun Zargar More articles by this author Octay Akca More articles by this author Dinesh Samarasekera More articles by this author Luis Felipe Brandao More articles by this author Jihad Kaouk More articles by this author Georges-Pascal Haber More articles by this author Robert Stein More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.