V407 MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY FOR THE TREATMENT OF BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA

Abstract

You have accessJournal of UrologyMale Voiding Dysfunction and Infection1 Apr 2013V407 MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY FOR THE TREATMENT OF BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA Youness Ahallal, Marc Galiano, Eric Barret, Petr Macek, Luca Lunelli, Rafael Sanchez-Salas, Francois Rozet, Laurent Mascle, and Xavier Cathelineau Youness AhallalYouness Ahallal Paris, France More articles by this author , Marc GalianoMarc Galiano Paris, France More articles by this author , Eric BarretEric Barret Paris, France More articles by this author , Petr MacekPetr Macek Paris, France More articles by this author , Luca LunelliLuca Lunelli Paris, France More articles by this author , Rafael Sanchez-SalasRafael Sanchez-Salas Paris, France More articles by this author , Francois RozetFrancois Rozet Paris, France More articles by this author , Laurent MascleLaurent Mascle Paris, France More articles by this author , and Xavier CathelineauXavier Cathelineau Paris, France More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2013.02.1796AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Minimally invasive approaches for benign prostatic hyperplasia are replacing the gold standard open surgical approach, featuring the same results with lower morbidity. In this video, we present laparoscopic and robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy (SP) using expraperitoneal transvesical or Millin approaches. METHODS We present 4 consecutive patients who underwent either laparoscopic or robotic-assisted SP for benign prostatic hyperplasia. The estimated prostate volume in the transrectal ultrasonography was 98, 121, 132 and 140 mL. The latter had 27 centimetric bladder calculi; he therefore underwent laparoscopic extraperitoneal transvesical SP. The other patients had robotic-assisted transvesical SP, laparoscopic and robotic-assisted extraperitoneal Millin SP, respectively. RESULTS The operation time, blood loss, duration of hospitalization, and duration of drain placement was 90, 120, 110 and 90 minutes; 300, 200, 500 and 400 cc; 5, 5, 4 and 4 days; 6, 5, 3 and 2 days for laparoscopic (conventional and robotic-assisted) transvesical SP and laparoscopic (conventional and robotic-assisted) Millin SP. CONCLUSIONS Laparoscopic (conventional or robotic-assisted) simple prostatectomy is a feasible method with low morbidity and improved postoperative outcomes. © 2013 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 189Issue 4SApril 2013Page: e165 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2013 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Youness Ahallal Paris, France More articles by this author Marc Galiano Paris, France More articles by this author Eric Barret Paris, France More articles by this author Petr Macek Paris, France More articles by this author Luca Lunelli Paris, France More articles by this author Rafael Sanchez-Salas Paris, France More articles by this author Francois Rozet Paris, France More articles by this author Laurent Mascle Paris, France More articles by this author Xavier Cathelineau Paris, France More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF DownloadLoading ...