V11-03 PENILE RECONSTRUCTION FOR CONGENITAL MICROPENIS WITH THE ANTEROLATERAL THIGH PEDICLED FLAP

Abstract

You have accessJournal of UrologyCME1 Apr 2023V11-03 PENILE RECONSTRUCTION FOR CONGENITAL MICROPENIS WITH THE ANTEROLATERAL THIGH PEDICLED FLAP Aurélie Schirmann, Nim Christopher, David Ralph, and Wai Gin Lee Aurélie SchirmannAurélie Schirmann More articles by this author , Nim ChristopherNim Christopher More articles by this author , David RalphDavid Ralph More articles by this author , and Wai Gin LeeWai Gin Lee More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003337.03AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Congenital micropenis is defined as a normally formed penis with a stretched penile length less than 2.5 standard deviations below the mean for that man’s age and ethnicity. Micropenis may present as an isolated condition or with other genital or multi-system abnormalities. Penile reconstruction or phalloplasty may be required where topical and systemic hormonal treatment have failed. The most common flap used for phalloplasty is the radial artery forearm free flap phalloplasty. Other alternatives include the anterolateral thigh (ALT), musculocutaneous latissimus dorsi and abdominal flaps.The aim of this video is to illustrate the technique for penile reconstruction using a pedicled ALT flap without integrated urethra. METHODS: A 21-year-old man with micropenis and hypospadias from a disorder of sexual differentiation (46XY) presents for penile reconstruction following multiple failed attempts at hypospadias repair. He requested an ALT flap without integrated urethra because he is dependent on a long-term suprapubic catheter due to a hypocontractile bladder.Intraoperative vascular doppler identified 3 perforators from the descending branch of the lateral circumflex iliac artery of the left leg. The flap was designed centred on the perforators with dimensions of 14cm (length), 13cm (width at base) and 12cm (width at tip). The flap was raised carefully and transferred to the recipient groin. The neophallus was constructed and microsurgical anastomosis of the lateral cutaneous of the thigh to one of the dorsal penile nerves with 8/0 nylon was completed. The partially divided left vastus lateralis muscle was re-approximated and the skin edges drawn in and flattened. The left thigh was then resurfaced with a 14/1000 of an inch split-thickness skin graft from the contralateral thigh. All wounds were dressed. RESULTS: The man had an uneventful post-operative course with careful vascular monitoring, and he was discharged on day 10. He is currently awaiting glans-sculpting and will eventually proceed with insertion of an inflatable erectile device. CONCLUSIONS: Penile reconstruction using an ALT flap can be offered to a well-informed and motivated man with a micropenis following appropriate assessment. As shown, the technique requires careful dissection of the perforator vessels and can usually be transferred as a pedicled flap. Pedicled flaps do not require microvascular anastomosis and therefore have a lower risk of vascular compromise. Further aesthetic and functional refinements like the insertion of an erectile device are possible in later stages, if desired. Source of Funding: None declared © 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 209Issue Supplement 4April 2023Page: e999 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Aurélie Schirmann More articles by this author Nim Christopher More articles by this author David Ralph More articles by this author Wai Gin Lee More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...