Abstract
Ultra-Violet (UV) radiation covers the spectrum of wavelengths from 100 to 400 nm. The potency and biological activity for a variety of endpoints differ by wavelength. For monitoring and communication purposes, different UV action spectra have been developed. These spectra use different weighting functions. The action spectrum for erythemal dose is the most widely used one. This erythemal dose per time or dose-rate has been further simplified into a “UV index”. Following this example, in our review we use the term “index” or (plural) “indices” in a more general description for all simplified single-value measures for any biologically effective UV dose, e.g., for human non-melanoma skin cancer and for previtamin D production rate. Ongoing discussion about the existence of an increased melanoma risk due to UV-A exposure underscores the uncertainties inherent in current weighting functions. Thus, we performed an online literature search to review the data basis for these indices, to understand their relevance for an individual, and to assess the applicability of the indices for a range of exposure scenarios. Even for natural (solar) UV, the spectral composition varies spatially and temporally. Artificial UV sources and personal protection introduce further variation to the spectral composition. Many biological effects are proposed for UV radiation. Only few endpoints have been studied sufficiently to estimate a reliable index. Weighting functions for chronic effects and most importantly for cancer endpoints have been developed in animal models, and often for proxy endpoints only. Epidemiological studies on biological effects of UV radiation should not only depend on single-value weighted UV dose estimates (indexes) but should strive for a more detailed description of the individual exposure. A better understanding of the adverse and beneficial effects of UV radiation by wavelength would also improve medical counseling and health communication regarding individual health-supportive behavior.
Highlights
Epidemiologists love and need simple exposure metrics
We found a positive and significant association between exposure and melanoma incidence
Schrempf et al in this issue [2] correctly point out that the increase in melanoma incidence per 100 m in altitude is much larger than the increase in UV exposure for the same difference in altitude as assessed in our paper
Summary
Either with a dichotomous parameter (exposed yes/no) or with categorical or continuous variables, modeling is easy so that meaningful risk estimates or even dose-response functions can be established to inform society and policy. In our own ecological study [1] on Austrian data, we have estimated “Ultra-violet (UV) exposure” as a single continuous variable that was mostly influenced by altitude. We found a positive and significant association between exposure and melanoma incidence. Schrempf et al in this issue [2] correctly point out that the increase in melanoma incidence per 100 m in altitude is much larger than the increase in UV exposure for the same difference in altitude as assessed in our paper. We did not see the same association of altitude or UV exposure with melanoma mortality, and there is some indication that melanoma
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: International journal of environmental research and public health
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
