Utilizing well-reservoir pseudo-connections for multi-stage hydraulic fracturing modeling in tight gas saturated formations

Abstract

Purpose. Research is aimed at integrating multi-stage hydraulic fracturing in horizontal wells with hydrodynamic simulation as a mandatory part of planning the mining of any shale oil or gas reservoir. Methods. Geological and hydrodynamic reservoir modeling is part of the research. The properties and geometries of the hydraulic fracture network and its representation in the dynamic reservoir model were assessed. The comparative characterization was carried out based on the two methods of fracture modeling: cell dimension reduction for explicit fracture modeling (LGR – local grid refinement) and implicit fracture modeling method, presented in this paper, with additional pseudo-connections between well and reservoir. Findings. A hydrodynamic model for low-permeable reservoir, produced by horizontal well, hydraulically fractured with 5 stages, has been generated. This model is calibrated to the production history and flowing bottom hole pressure by applying two methods of fracture modeling. Modeling results show that it is possible to replicate historical well production by using both methods. However, the proposed method with pseudo connections has several advantages compared to the generally accepted, local grid refinement (LGR) method. Originality. For the first time, a system of pseudo connections between well and reservoir was constructed to model a multi-stage hydraulic fracturing for a hydrodynamic model of tight reservoir. Hydrodynamic simulation results were refined and calibrated to the history of hydrocarbon production and flowing bottom hole pressure data using the pseudo-connections and LGR methods. The similarity of the results by applying LGR and pseudo-connections methods was revealed. Practical implications. The use of pseudo connections for hydraulic fracturing modeling can reduce simulation run time for cases where multi-stage hydraulic fracturing has already been carried out or is planned in the future. Additionally, the use of this method allows testing a larger number of realizations and scenarios, including hydraulic fracturing design (number of stages, size and conductivity of resulted fracture systems, fracture orientation, etc.), well placement and fracture growth relative to well trajectory. Also, there is no need to rebuild a model every time for each realization, as is the case with the LGR method.