Abstract

Abstract Discharge transitions are one of the highest risk activities in healthcare. Physical therapists (PTs) and physician assistants (PAs) have a critical role in discharge transitional planning in the acute care arena. Simulation based interprofessional education (SIM-IPE) is an emerging teaching technique involving participants from two or more professions engaged in a simulated experience. The aims of the interprofessional program were to compare the discharge transition recommendations of PT and PA students of a medically complex, acute care patient pre- and post- SIM-IPE and to compare the clinical decision-making rationale for the discharge transition recommendation pre- and post- SIM-IPE. PT and PA students participated in SIM-IPE encounters with standardized patients. The encounters focused on high-risk, problem-prone patients with variable discharge transition options. The most frequently recommended discharge transition pre- SIM-IPE was the same between the PT and PA students; however, there was a 29.5% discordance when comparing the rank ordering of discharge transition recommendations between PT and PA. Prior to the SIM-IPE, PT students gave the highest priority to functional status and home situation, and PA students gave the highest priority to medical status, medical prognosis, and medications. Following the SIM-IPE, PT students ranked medical status, medical prognosis, and medications higher as discharge transition clinical decision-making variables as compared with their pre- SIM-IPE data, and PA students ranked functional status and home situation higher as discharge transition clinical decision-making variables as compared to their pre- SIM-IPE data. In this teaching and learning experience, the SIM-IPE intervention appeared to influence clinical decision-making of participants.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call