Abstract

Differentiating high-grade glioma (HGG) and isolated brain metastasis (BM) is important for determining appropriate treatment. Radiomics, utilizing quantitative imaging features, offers the potential for improved diagnostic accuracy in this context. To differentiate high-grade (grade 4) glioma and BM using machine learning models from radiomics data obtained from T2-FLAIR digital subtraction images and the peritumoral edema area. Retrospective. The study included 1287 patients. Of these, 602 were male and 685 were female. Of the 788 HGG patients included in the study, 702 had solitary masses. Of the 499 BM patients included in the study, 112 had solitary masses. Initially, the model was developed and tested on solitary masses. Subsequently, the model was developed and tested separately for all patients (solitary and multiple masses). Axial T2-weighted fast spin-echo sequence (T2WI) and T2-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery sequence (T2-FLAIR), using 1.5-T and 3.0-T scanners. Radiomic features were extracted from digitally subtracted T2-FLAIR images in the area of peritumoral edema. The maximum relevance-minimum redundancy (mRMR) method was then used for dimensionality reduction. The naive Bayes algorithm was used in model development. The interpretability of the model was explored using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). Chi-square test, one-way analysis of variance, and Kruskal-Wallis test were performed. The P values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. The performance metrics include area under curve (AUC), sensitivity (SENS), and specificity (SPEC). The mean age of HGG patients was 61.4 ± 13.2 years and 61.7 ± 12.2 years for BM patients. In the external validation cohort, the model achieved AUC: 0.991, SENS: 0.983, and SPEC: 0.922. The external cohort results for patients with solitary lesions were AUC: 0.987, SENS: 0.950, and SPEC: 0.922. The artificial intelligence model, developed with radiomics data from the peritumoral edema area in T2-FLAIR digital subtraction images, might be able to differentiate isolated BM from HGG. 3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.