Abstract

BackgroundIntensive longitudinal methods (ILMs) for collecting self-report (e.g., daily diaries, ecological momentary assessment) and passive data from smartphones and wearable sensors provide promising avenues for improved prediction of depression and suicidal ideation (SI). However, few studies have utilized ILMs to predict outcomes for at-risk, non-clinical populations in real-world settings. MethodsMedical interns (N = 2881; 57 % female; 58 % White) were recruited from over 300 US residency programs. Interns completed a pre-internship assessment of depression, were given Fitbit wearable devices, and provided daily mood ratings (scale: 1–10) via mobile application during the study period. Three-step hierarchical logistic regressions were used to predict depression and SI at the end of the first quarter utilizing pre-internship predictors in step 1, Fitbit sleep/step features in step 2, and daily diary mood features in step 3. ResultsPassively collected Fitbit features related to sleep and steps had negligible predictive validity for depression, and no incremental predictive validity for SI. However, mean-level and variability in mood scores derived from daily diaries were significant independent predictors of depression and SI, and significantly improved model accuracy. LimitationsWork schedules for interns may result in sleep and activity patterns that differ from typical associations with depression or SI. The SI measure did not capture intent or severity. ConclusionsMobile self-reporting of daily mood improved the prediction of depression and SI during a meaningful at-risk period under naturalistic conditions. Additional research is needed to guide the development of adaptive interventions among vulnerable populations.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call