Abstract

BackgroundPalliative radiotherapy (PRT) can significantly improve quality of life for patients dying of cancer with bone metastases. However, an aggressive cancer treatment near end of life is an indicator of poor-quality care. But the optimal rate of overall palliative RT use near the end of life is still unknown. We sought to determine the patterns of palliative radiation therapy (RT) utilization in patients with bone metastases towards their end of life in a population-based, publicly funded health care system.MethodsAll consecutive patients with bone metastases treated with RT between 2007 and 2011 were identified in a provincial Canadian cancer registry database. Patients were categorized as receiving RT in the last 2 weeks, 2–4 weeks, or >4 weeks before their death. Associations between RT fractionation utilization by these categories, and patient and provider characteristics were assessed through logistic regression.ResultsOf the 16,898 courses 1734 (10.3) and 709 (4.2 %) were prescribed to patients in the last 2–4 weeks and <2 weeks of their life, respectively. Primary lung (8 %) and gastrointestinal (6.9 %) cancers received palliative RT more commonly in the last 2 weeks of life (OR 3.72 [2.86–4.84] & 3.33 [2.42–4.58] respectively, p <0.001). Among the 709 patients who received RT in the last 2 weeks of life, 350 (49), 167 (24), and 127 (18 %) were for spine, pelvis, and extremity metastases, respectively. RT was prescribed most frequently to spine (5 %) and extremity (4 %) metastases p <0.001 in the last two weeks of life, though only varied between 1 % (sternum) and 5 % (spine) by site of metastases. Single fraction RT was prescribed more commonly in the last 2 weeks of life (64.2 %), compared to individuals who received RT 2–4 weeks (54.5), and >4 weeks (47.9 %) before death (p <0.001).ConclusionsThis population-based analysis found that only 4 % of patients with bone metastases received radiation therapy during the last 2 weeks of their life in our population-based, publicly funded program, though it was significantly higher in patients with lung cancer and those with metastases to the spine or extremity. Appropriately, use of multiple fractions palliative RT was less common in patients closer to death.

Highlights

  • Palliative radiotherapy (PRT) can significantly improve quality of life for patients dying of cancer with bone metastases

  • We previously published initial results demonstrating variation in radiation therapy (RT) prescribing practices for bone metastases in British Columbia (BC), where we demonstrated an association between fractionation and prognosis [10]

  • The primary objective of this current study is to explore the patterns of RT usage in patients with bone metastases towards their end of life

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Palliative radiotherapy (PRT) can significantly improve quality of life for patients dying of cancer with bone metastases. An aggressive cancer treatment near end of life is an indicator of poor-quality care. The optimal rate of overall palliative RT use near the end of life is still unknown. The optimal rate of palliative RT use near the end of life is still unknown [5]. The use of systemic therapies at the end of life has been extensively studied, and same is Tiwana et al BMC Palliative Care (2016) 15:2 warranted for optimal rate of palliative RT usage in such patients [6, 7]. An overly aggressive cancer treatment at the end of life may be an indicator of poor-quality care [6,7,8]. The total palliative RT dose, the dose per fraction and the technique of irradiation use may vary with the treatment aim in patients with bone metastases [9]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.