Abstract
Herein, we compare the electrochemical and electrocatalytic properties of two selected, water-insoluble Fe(II) coordination complexes made with the non-symmetric, bidentate ligands, 2-(2′-pyridyl)benzimidazole (PBI) in [Fe(PBI)3](OTf)2 (1, OTf− = trifluoromethyl sulfonate anion) and 2-(2′-pyridyl)benzoxazole (PBO) in [Fe(PBO)2(OTf)2] (2) . Cyclic voltammetry in water/acetonitrile mixture indicates considerable activity for both compounds. However, only 1 acts as homogeneous catalyst. The complexes have been successfully immobilized on indium-tin-oxide (ITO) electrode surface. The hydrophobic ligands allowed for a simple dip-coating and drop-casting of 1 and 2 onto ITO. Both 1/ITO and 2/ITO showed increased activity in electrocatalytic O2 evolution in borate buffer at pH 8.3. According to scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), moreover, re-dissolution tests, the Fe remains in complex with PBI during electrolysis in the drop-casted, nano-porous films of 1/ITO. In contrast, the PBO complex in 2/ITO undergoes a rapid in situ decomposition yielding a mineralized form that is responsible for catalysis.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
