Abstract

Synopsis:This study aims to investigate the dosimetric accuracy and performance stability of different registration methods for CBCT-guided prostate radiotherapy. The planning CT (pCT) was deformably registered to CBCT to construct a deformed pCT (dpCT). Image registrations were conducted between pCT and dpCT, by using automatic whole image, automatic PTV-based and manual registration. Dose distribution in each registered dpCT datasets and dose accumulation for each patient were calculated. Statistically significant difference was observed in bladder dose. However, there was no significant differences in target and rectal doses. Additionally, increasing target hotspots over time was observed in all techniques. Synopsis: This study aims to investigate the dosimetric accuracy and performance stability of different registration methods for CBCT-guided prostate radiotherapy. The planning CT (pCT) was deformably registered to CBCT to construct a deformed pCT (dpCT). Image registrations were conducted between pCT and dpCT, by using automatic whole image, automatic PTV-based and manual registration. Dose distribution in each registered dpCT datasets and dose accumulation for each patient were calculated. Statistically significant difference was observed in bladder dose. However, there was no significant differences in target and rectal doses. Additionally, increasing target hotspots over time was observed in all techniques.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.