Abstract
Physical-chemical processes for the capture and sequestration of CO 2 from fossil fuel-fired power plant flue-gases are very expensive. Biological processes for CO 2 utilization involve plant photosynthesis and conversion of the biomass to fuels, with no net CO 2 production. Terrestrial plants cannot utilize flue gas CO 2 directly. Only submerged aquatic plants, particularly microalgae, can utilize CO 2 from power plant flue gases in a practical process. Microalgae have the potential for achieving high productivities and can be converted to gaseous and liquid fuels. A preliminary cost-analysis of such a process is presented that suggests that, if high productivities are achievable, overall costs would compare favorably with alternative physical-chemical processes for flue gas CO 2 capture and sequestration, but would be higher than CO 2 mitigation with terrestrial plants. Microalgae CO 2 utilization systems would be most applicable where land and water (seawater, brackish) resources, not readily utilized by agriculture, are available.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
