Abstract

ImportanceMedicare beneficiaries with high medical needs can benefit from Advance Care Planning (ACP). Medicare reimburses clinical providers for ACP discussions, but it is unknown whether high-need beneficiaries are receiving this service.ObjectiveTo compare rates of billed ACP discussions among a cohort of high-need Medicare beneficiaries with the non-high-needs Medicare population.DesignRetrospective analysis of Medicare Fee-for-Service (FFS) claims in 2017 comparing high-need beneficiaries (seriously ill, frail, ESRD, and disabled) with non-high need beneficiaries.SettingNationally representative FFS Medicare 20% sampleParticipantsMedicare beneficiaries were assigned to one of the following classifications: seriously ill (65+), frail (65+), seriously ill & frail (65+); non-high need (65+); end stage renal disease (ESRD) or disabled (<65). All participants had data available for years 2016–2017.ExposureReceipt of a billed ACP discussion, CPT codes 99497 or 99498.Main outcome and measureRates of billed ACP visits were compared between high-need patients and non-high-need patients. Rates were adjusted for the 65+ population for sex, age, race/ethnicity, Charlson comorbidity index, Medicare/Medicaid dual eligibility status, and Hospital Referral Region.ResultsAmong the 65+ groups, those most likely to have a billed ACP discussion included seriously ill & frail (5.2%), seriously ill (4.2%), and frail (3.3%). Rates remained consistent after adjusting (4.5%, 4.0%, 3.1%, respectively). Each subgroup differed significantly (p < .05) from non-high need beneficiaries (2.3%) in both unadjusted and adjusted analyses. Among the <65 high need groups, the rates were 2.7% for ESRD and 1.3% for the disabled (the latter p < .05 compared with non-high needs).Conclusions and relevanceWhile rates of billed ACP discussions varied among patient groups with high medical needs, overall they were relatively low, even among a cohort of patients for whom ACP may be especially relevant.

Highlights

  • Advance Care Planning (ACP) aims to align medical treatment to patients’ values, goals and preferences for care during serious and chronic illness.[1],[2] Medicare is the United States federal health insurance program designed to cover individuals over age 65, and under age 65 who have a qualifying disability or end-stage renal disease (ESRD)

  • Among the 65+ groups, those most likely to have a billed ACP discussion included seriously ill & frail (5.2%), seriously ill (4.2%), and frail (3.3%)

  • While rates of billed ACP discussions varied among patient groups with high medical needs, overall they were relatively low, even among a cohort of patients for whom ACP may be especially relevant

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Advance Care Planning (ACP) aims to align medical treatment to patients’ values, goals and preferences for care during serious and chronic illness.[1],[2] Medicare is the United States federal health insurance program designed to cover individuals over age 65, and under age 65 who have a qualifying disability or end-stage renal disease (ESRD). ACP includes a discussion between a qualified healthcare provider and a patient, and is an important component of care management. A recent analysis of interventions and policies related to ACP recommended a focus on the seriously ill to improve value of care towards the end of life.[3] Given that roll-out of ACP billing procedures may require investment of time and money by health systems, timing ACP strategically via prognostic stratification of patients can help to identify groups at higher risk for facing end-of-life decisions, [4] and may improve quality of life, family outcomes, and reduce costs. We hypothesized that high needs patients of all types would have higher rates of billed ACP discussions than other patients

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call