Utilization and outcomes of high-dose chemotherapy and stem-cell rescue in patient with testicular cancer from 2005 to 2014 in United States.

Abstract

e18246 Background: Testicular tumors are potentially curable by means of high-dose chemotherapy plus hematopoietic stem-cell rescue. This regimen is commonly used as salvage therapy, third-line or later therapy in patients with platinum-refractory disease. The utilization and real-world outcomes and complications of patients with testicular cancer undergoing autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (aHSCT) in United States are unknown. Methods: We queried National Inpatient Sample, a large inpatient data set in the United States, from 2005 to 2014 for male patients with testicular cancer or multiple myeloma (control group) receiving aHSCT and compared outcomes between these groups. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality rate, and the secondary outcomes included in-hospital complications of aHSCT, length of stay and total charges. Outcomes were assessed by means of univariate analysis, multivariate regression and propensity score matched-pair analysis. Results: A total of 391 patients (weighted N = 1,909) with testicular cancer and 4,809 male patients (weighted N = 23,501) with multiple myeloma who underwent aHSCT from 2005 to 2014 were identified. Mean age of patients with testicular cancer was 32.3 years vs 59 years for multiple myeloma patients (p < 0.001) There were no differences in in-hospital mortality rates (1.5% vs 1.4%, p = 0.85) or rates of intubation (2.3% vs 1.6%, p = 0.36), sepsis (7.7% vs 7.5%, p = 0.94), bacteremia (13.5% vs 15.6%, p = 0.42), or stomatitis (43.8% vs 38.8%, p = 0.87) between patients with testicular cancer and multiple myeloma receiving autologous HSCT. However, utilization of total parenteral nutrition was higher in patients with testicular cancer (12.9% vs 4.7%, p < 0.001). There was no difference in length of stay (17.5 vs 17.5 days, p = 0.77) and total charges (121,120$ vs 123,729$, p = 0.74) between two groups. The results were consistent in multivariate and propensity score matched-pair analysis. Conclusions: The in-hospital outcomes of patients with testicular cancer receiving aHSCT appears to be similar to patients with multiple myeloma. However, overall utilization of aHSCT for testicular cancer appears to be low in United States.