Utility of the Rey-15 Recognition Trial to Detect Invalid Performance in a Forensic Neuropsychological Sample

Abstract

The current study sought to address the utility of the Rey Fifteen Item Test (Rey-15), with the use of a combined score [recall correct + (recognition correct – false positives)], to distinguish between valid and invalid performance among a sample of litigating persons referred for neuropsychological evaluation. Scores on the Rey-15 were analyzed across four comparison groups: (1) litigating persons with evidence of invalid performance (n = 29), (2) litigating persons with valid performance (n = 63), (3) learning-disabled patients (n = 36), and (4) a mixed clinical neuropsychological sample not involved in litigation (n = 54). A Rey-15 combined cutoff score of < 21 yielded the highest sensitivity (70%) and specificity (92.8%) rates. If the Rey-15 is to be used in clinical practice to detect invalid performance, the recognition trial with combined score < 21 should be used. Findings support the use of the combined Rey-15 score in place of the previously used recall Rey-15 score to improve sensitivity and specificity rates for detection of invalid performance in litigating neuropsychological referrals.