Utility of the pattern-based approach using BIOCHIP-indirect immunofluorescence in the evaluation of subepidermal bullous disorders.

Abstract

Subepidermal bullous disorders (SEBD) are a heterogeneous group of vesiculobullous diseases because of antibody-mediated destruction of proteins of the dermo-epidermal junction. Direct immunofluorescence (DIF) is the gold standard for diagnosis. BIOCHIP-indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) is a novel serological test that combines multiple target antigens in a single field. The present study aimed to evaluate the utility of the pattern-based approach in BIOCHIP-IIF for the diagnosis of SEBD. Seventy cases of BIOCHIP-IIF that showed clinical, histopathological, and/or DIF features favoring SEBD were included in the study. The interpretation in the BIOCHIP was categorized into one of the following patterns. Pattern I: basement membrane zone (BMZ) staining in monkey esophagus (ME), primate salt-split skin (SSS)-roof staining, BP180+ and/or BP230+; Pattern II: roof staining in SSS, BP180- and BP230- with or without BMZ staining in ME; Pattern III: floor staining in SSS, BP180- and BP230-; and pattern IV: negative in SSS and other substrates. The findings were correlated with histopathology and/or DIF. Fifty (71.5%) cases showed pattern I or the typical bullous pemphigoid (BP) pattern. Eight (11.4%) cases showed pattern II. Patterns III and IV were observed in seven (10%) and five (7.1%) cases, respectively. BP was the most common diagnosis in patterns I and II, while anti-p200 pemphigoid was most common in pattern III, as confirmed by immunoblotting. The sensitivity of pattern I in the diagnosis of BP was 96%. BIOCHIP-IIF showed a good correlation with DIF and histopathology in the diagnosis of SEBD. This can be used as a first-line investigation in case of bullous disorders.