Utility of a Systematic Approach to Selecting Candidate Prodrugs: A Case Study Using Candesartan Ester Analogues

Abstract

Development of prodrugs is a useful strategy to overcome some disadvantages of candidate drugs. Recently, we established a systematic approach to selecting appropriate prodrugs, and validated the utility of this approach using oseltamivir analogues. In this study, the utility of the approach was further examined using candesartan cilexetil and 20 kinds of its analogues having various types of side chain as model compounds. Log D values of analogues (2.5 to 4.7) were higher than that of candesartan (1.0), their active metabolite, and the results were reasonable for the purpose of improving permeability of candesartan. The analogues tended to be more soluble in artificial intestinal fluids than in artificial gastric fluid, owing to their acidic physicochemical characteristics. Their membrane permeabilities were not correlated with log D values, which can be attributed to the metabolism in Caco-2 cells used in this system. In human hepatocytes and enterocytes, 11 out of the 20 analogues were immediately hydrolyzed to candesartan, and species differences were observed in the hydrolysis efficiency. This study confirmed the utility of the systematic approach for selection of appropriate prodrugs that could be proceeded to in vivo pharmacokinetics study, with selection of suitable experimental animals.