Utilitarian Ethics and Democratic Government

Abstract

Previous articleNext article No AccessUtilitarian Ethics and Democratic GovernmentJonathan RileyJonathan Riley Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Ethics Volume 100, Number 2Jan., 1990 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/293180 Views: 203Total views on this site Citations: 18Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1990 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Carly Elizabeth Schall Diversity discourses: moral, ethical and pragmatic reasoning in the Swedish immigration and integration debate, 1968–1975 and 1991–1995, American Journal of Cultural Sociology 10, no.11 (Jun 2020): 65–86.https://doi.org/10.1057/s41290-020-00105-yHerrade Igersheim, François Durand, Aaron Hamlin, Jean-François Laslier Comparing voting methods: 2016 US presidential election, European Journal of Political Economy 71 (Jan 2022): 102057.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2021.102057Pierpaolo Marrone Epistemic Democracy and Technopolitics, International Journal of Technoethics 13, no.11 (Jan 2022): 1–14.https://doi.org/10.4018/IJT.291551Michitaka Funayama, Akihiro Koreki, Taro Muramatsu, Masaru Mimura, Motoichiro Kato, Takayuki Abe Impairment in judgement of the moral emotion guilt following orbitofrontal cortex damage, Journal of Neuropsychology 13, no.33 (Apr 2018): 550–563.https://doi.org/10.1111/jnp.12158Jonas Hultin Rosenberg Equality, Proportionality, and the All-Affected Principle, Democratic Theory 6, no.11 (Jun 2019): 73–96.https://doi.org/10.3167/dt.2019.060105Jonathan Riley John Stuart Mill: Political Economist, History of Political Economy 48, no.44 (Dec 2016): 752–758.https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-3687355Eerik Lagerspetz Plurality, approval, or Borda? A nineteenth century dispute on voting rules, Public Choice 168, no.3-43-4 (Aug 2016): 265–277.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-016-0361-4Marcus Pivato Asymptotic utilitarianism in scoring rules, Social Choice and Welfare 47, no.22 (Jun 2016): 431–458.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-016-0971-2Eerik Lagerspetz On Voting, (Jan 2016): 53–169.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23261-4_3Jonathan Riley Greatest Happiness Principle, (Feb 2013).https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444367072.wbiee762Eerik Lagerspetz Intensity Comparisons, the Borda Rule and Democratic Theory, (Mar 2013): 103–121.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35929-3_6Jonathan Riley THE INTERPRETATION OF MAXIMIZING UTILITARIANISM, Social Philosophy and Policy 26, no.11 (Nov 2008): 286–325.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052509090128John C. Toro The Charade of Tradition-Based Substantive Due Process, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2008).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1152856JACK KNIGHT, JAMES JOHNSON The Priority of Democracy: A Pragmatist Approach to Political-Economic Institutions and the Burden of Justification, American Political Science Review 101, no.0101 (Feb 2007): 47–61.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055407070062Jonathan Riley Utilitarian Liberalism: Between Gray and Mill, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 9, no.22 (Aug 2006): 117–135.https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230600654977Eduardo Rodriguez Social Attitudes and the Human Genome Project: Ethical Implications, The Linacre Quarterly 67, no.11 (Feb 2000): 28–40.https://doi.org/10.1080/20508549.2000.11877565Jonathan Riley On Quantities and Qualities of Pleasure, Utilitas 5, no.22 (Jan 2009): 291–300.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953820800005811M. H. Laine, P. J. Kelly The J. S. Mill Bibliography: Recent Additions, Utilitas 2, no.22 (Jan 2009): 345–348.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953820800000807