Abstract

The present study was designed to assess whether isoflurane requirement was significantly affected by fresh gas flow in a closed-circuit system. Sixty patients scheduled for orthopaedic procedures were randomly assigned into three groups. In group A (n=20), anaesthesia was conducted with a fresh gas flow of 482.5±186.6 ml · min −1, corresponding to the patient's metabolic demand. In group B (n=20), the fresh gas flow was 2000 ml · min −1. In group C (n=20), it was adjusted to the ventilation minute, i.e. 7145±986 ml · min −1. Artificial ventilation was conducted using a tidal volume of 10 ml · kg −1 and a rate of 10 to 12 c · min −1. Anaesthesia was induced after 10 min denitrogenation with fentanyl (4 μg · kg −1), thiopentone (4 mg · kg −1) and vecuronium (0.1 mg · kg −1). Fio 2 was then brought to 0.5 in nitrous oxide and was monitored continuously using a polarographic oxymeter. Liquid isoflurane was injected in the expiratory limb of the circuit using an electrical syringe driver. Alveolar concentration of isoflurane was set at 0.92 vol. % according to Lowe and Ernst [5]. Statistical analysis was carried out using Student's test for means. Anaesthesia lasted 138±88.3 min in group A, 125.5±45.1 min in group B and 146.5±50 min in group C, no difference being significant. The requirements in liquid isoflurane for the first hour were 5.85±1.32 ml in group A, 10.75±1.12 ml in group B and 67.15±19.51 ml in group C. The total isoflurane consumption reached 11.32±6.73 ml in group A, 19.20±7.12 ml in group B and 157.20±40.41 ml in group C. The cost of isoflurane during the first hour (in US dollars; 1 U$ = 6,14 FF) was 4.30±0.97 in group A, 7.79±0.93 in group B and 49.32±14.33 in group C. The total cost reached 8.28±4.94 in group A, 14.10±5.23 in group B and 115.47±29.68 in group C. The difference in consumption and expense between groups A, B and C were significant (p<0.001). As isoflurane is 4.4 times more expensive than enflurane and 9.7 more than halothane, the dramatic saving with closed-circuit anaesthesia led to save a large sum of money, thus compensating the expenses for gas and vapour analysers which increase the security of low flow anaesthesia.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.