Abstract
Distinction between near-occlusion and occlusion of the internal carotid artery (ICA) is relevant because patients can benefit from a surgical treatment in the first case. Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) is the best neuroimaging technique for its diagnosis but the possibility of related neurologic complications suggests the use of non-invasive tests. Ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) have been proposed as alternative techniques of diagnosis. But these can provoke an erroneous diagnosis when a near occlusion of ICA is present. Multislice helicoidal computed tomographic angiography (MHCTA) can play a role in these situations. Case 1: patient diagnosed of occlusion of the left ICA by cervical US. Cerebral magnetic resonance suggested severe stenosis of intracavernous ICA. MHTCA showed carotid permeability. Case 2: patient diagnosed by cervical US of near occlusion and of occlusion/pseudoocclusion by enhanced RMA. MHCTA showed filiform patency of the cervical ICA. Case 3: a cervical US diagnosed moderate stenosis of the right ICA and severe of the left. Transcranial Doppler suggested near occlusion of the right ICA. MHTCA confirmed near occlusion of the right ICA. MHCTA correctly diagnosed near occlusion in three patients in which minimally invasive techniques had discrepancies. MHTCA is a new diagnostic technique whose lack of dependence of flow makes a good alternative to confirm findings of US of the cervical ICA.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.