Abstract

ObjectiveTo examine the quality of life experienced by women with symptomatic uterine fibroids who had been treated with UAE in comparison to myomectomy. We report the four-year follow-up of the FEMME randomised trial. Two-year follow-up data has been previously reported.Study DesignPremenopausal women who had symptomatic uterine fibroids amenable to myomectomy or uterine artery embolization were recruited from 29 UK hospitals. Women were excluded if they had significant adenomyosis, any malignancy, pelvic inflammatory disease or had had a previous open myomectomy or uterine artery embolization.Participants were randomised to myomectomy or embolization in a 1:1 ratio using a minimisation algorithm. Myomectomy could be open abdominal, laparoscopic or hysteroscopic, according to clinician preference. Embolization of the uterine arteries was performed according to local practice, under fluoroscopic guidance.The primary outcome measure was the Uterine Fibroid Symptom Quality of Life questionnaire, adjusted for baseline score and reported here at four years post-randomisation. Subsequent procedures for fibroids, pregnancy and outcome were amongst secondary outcomes.Trial registration ISRCTN70772394 https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN70772394Results254 women were randomized, 127 to myomectomy (105 underwent myomectomy) and 127 to uterine artery embolization (98 underwent embolization). At four years, 67 (53%) and 81 (64%) completed UFS-QoL quality of life scores. Mean difference in the UFS-QoL at 4 years was 5.0 points (95% CI −1.4 to 11.5; p = 0.13) in favour of myomectomy. There were 15 pregnancies in the UAE group and 7 in the myomectomy group, with a cumulative pregnancy rate to four years of 15% and 6% respectively (hazard ratio: 0.48; 95% CI 0.18–1.28). The cumulative repeat procedure rate to four years was 24% in the UAE group and 13% in the myomectomy group (hazard ratio: 0.53; 95% CI 0.27–1.05).ConclusionsMyomectomy resulted in greater improvement in quality of life compared with uterine artery embolization, although by four years, this difference was not statistically significant. Missing data may limit the generalisability of this result. The numbers of women becoming pregnant were too small draw a conclusion on the effect of the procedures on fertility.

Highlights

  • Uterine fibroids are the most common tumour in women of re­ productive age, and are associated with heavy menstrual bleeding, abdominal discomfort, subfertility, and reduced quality of life

  • We have reported on the primary outcome of conditionspecific health-related quality of life (HRQoL) using the Uterine Fibroid Symptom Quality of Life questionnaire at two years

  • [15] Uterine artery embolization (UAE) is dominated by myomectomy and would not be considered a cost-effective al­ ternative over myomectomy, but this does not take into account any potential preference for a less invasive procedure. There is such a small difference in costs between the two procedures, fully informed patient preference should be acknowledged, and women should have the option to choose between the two procedures. Both UAE and myomectomy are effective treat­ ments for improving the quality of life of women with symptomatic uterine fibroids, but the advantage of myomectomy observed is not sustained at four years

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Uterine fibroids are the most common tumour in women of re­ productive age, and are associated with heavy menstrual bleeding, abdominal discomfort, subfertility, and reduced quality of life. For women seeking to keep their uterus, there was limited in­ formation on the relative effectiveness of myomectomy and UAE to guide their decision. Before the FEMME trial, there had been two previous randomized trials comparing UAE and myomectomy, [1,2,3] involving a total of 242 women, with substantial attrition in one, [1] and follow-up only to two years post-randomisation. These trials did not report on reproductive outcomes. These trials did not report on reproductive outcomes. [4]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call