Year-end Sale % OFF 
Abstract
ABSTRACTThe legitimacy of Australia’s legal and political systems lies in the understanding that the British and then Australian governments validly secured sovereignty, and, in doing so, legally annexed the land occupied by Indigenous peoples, and the people themselves, under the laws of the Crown. This paper critically examines the legal foundations of Australian sovereignty by comparing the earliest judicial statements that outline the basis and extent of Australian sovereignty with the positions taken by various key High Court judgements in the twentieth century, as well as contemporary statements by former Prime Minister Turnbull in response to the Uluru Statement from the Heart. This analysis reveals how the legal and political discourses asserting Australian sovereignty continually re-write history to develop dramatically differing legal narratives to suit changing social and political climates. When examined alongside the ceaseless assertions of sovereignty by Indigenous peoples preceding colonisation till the present it becomes apparent how judges and politicians have participated in promulgating legal fictions to provide legitimacy to an unjustified and illegal denial of Indigenous sovereignty from 1770 until the present.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
