Using winter flounder growth rates to assess habitat quality in Rhode Island's coastal lagoons

Abstract

MEPS Marine Ecology Progress Series Contact the journal Facebook Twitter RSS Mailing List Subscribe to our mailing list via Mailchimp HomeLatest VolumeAbout the JournalEditorsTheme Sections MEPS 201:287-299 (2000) - doi:10.3354/meps201287 Using winter flounder growth rates to assess habitat quality in Rhode Island's coastal lagoons Lesa Meng1,*, Cynthia Gray2, Bryan Taplin1, Erin Kupcha3 1Atlantic Ecology Division, US Environmental Protection Agency, 27 Tarzwell Drive, Narragansett, Rhode Island 02882, USA 2Division of Fish and Wildlife, Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management, 150 Fowler Street, Wickford, Rhode Island 02852, USA 3Roger Williams University, One Old Ferry Road, Bristol, Rhode Island 02809, USA *E-mail: meng.lesa@epamail.epa.gov ABSTRACT: We used growth rates of juvenile winter flounder Pseudopleuronectes americanus, to assess habitat quality in 3 of Rhode Island's coastal salt ponds that had differing levels of nutrients and human development. In each pond, 1 m2 cages were placed in vegetated and unvegetated habitats and growth rates of individually marked fish were measured in three 10 to 15 d experiments from 4 June to 7 July 1997. Water temperature, salinity, dissolved oxygen, and benthic food were also measured. Stable isotopes of C and N were measured in experimental and wild fish. Growth rates were 0.06 to 0.76 mm d-1 and decreased through the experiments. Growth rates of wild fish (0.19 mm d-1 in Point Judith Pond and 0.21 in Ninigret Pond) were similar to the average of the 2nd and 3rd experiments (0.24 mm d-1). Growth rates were the same in vegetated and unvegetated sites. They were also the same in Point Judith and Ninigret ponds but lower in Green Hill Pond. An ANCOVA suggested that Green Hill's lower rates were caused by its higher temperatures, particularly during the 3rd experiment. Benthic food was similar in the different ponds, different habitat types, and in cores taken inside and outside cages. Categories of food consumed by fish were not affected by the presence of vegetation in a cage, although food consumed did differ from pond to pond. Amphipods were the preferred food in all ponds; fish consumed proportionately more amphipods and fewer polychaetes in Ninigret Pond than in the other ponds. Values of δ15N in the fish varied with the degree of development in the watershed but not with total nitrogen in the water column. The results of this study indicate that growth rates of fish can be used as indicators of habitat quality. KEY WORDS: Fish habitat · Habitat quality · Estuaries · Fish growth · Stable isotopes Full article in pdf format PreviousNextExport citation RSS - Facebook - Tweet - linkedIn Cited by Published in MEPS Vol. 201. Online publication date: August 09, 2000 Print ISSN: 0171-8630; Online ISSN: 1616-1599 Copyright © 2000 Inter-Research.