Using the shakedown theory to study the cyclic behaviour of an unreinforced and fibre-reinforced stabilized soft soil

Abstract

ABSTRACT When a material is subjected to cyclic loading, there are changes in the material’s geomechanical behaviour that need to be characterized for a safe design. For unbounded granular materials, the shakedown theory is used to explain the soil’s behaviour under cyclic loading. However, it is not clear yet if such theory is extendable to unreinforced and fibre-reinforced stabilized soils. To this end, a series of unconfined compression cycling loading tests were performed, to study the effect of the number of cycles and initial deviatoric stress level on the behaviour of an unreinforced and reinforced stabilized soil. The results were analysed in terms of shakedown theory, elastic and plastic deformation energy and damping ratio. It was observed that shakedown theory seems to represent the behaviour of the stabilized unreinforced and fibre-reinforced soils under cyclic loading, with threshold between the plastic shakedown and the plastic creep shakedown behaviour at around an absolute axial strain 1 × 10–3. The effect of increasing binder content (from 12 to 39%), comparable to reducing the initial deviatoric stress level (from 85 to 15%), promoted a reduction in plastic deformation (from 2.09 to 0.19% without fibres, and 2.21 to 0.24% with fibres) and damping ratio (from 25.17 to 10.01% without fibres, and 29.18 to 15.95% with fibres) due to the lower degradation of the solid matrix. It also promoted an increase in the difference between elastic and plastic energy (from − 1.04 to 13.92 kJ/m3 without fibres, and − 1.68 to 10.19 kJ/m3 for the first cycle).