Using the Disclosure Decision-Making Model to Examine Patient Confusion Disclosure

Abstract

ABSTRACT The disclosure decision-making model (DD-MM) has been heavily explored within its initially proposed scope. Fewer known studies have tested the DD-MM’s boundaries by assessing the model’s application beyond close personal relationships, and none have explored it in a context outside of long-term health conditions. The current study investigates the disclosure decision-making process of patients to their healthcare providers when they experience situational confusion. A primarily quantitative online survey analyzed data from 251 U.S. adults who felt confusion during a recent appointment with their healthcare provider. Findings indicate that, although stigma and perceived disclosure efficacy impacted patient confusion disclosure as anticipated, anticipated response and relational quality (i.e., receiver assessments) did not play a significant role in disclosure. Stigma, anticipated response, and perceived disclosure efficacy were all related to remaining patient confusion as expected. This study contributes to our understanding of the scope of disclosure decision-making model as well as the to-date overlooked nuances of situational patient confusion: what impacts confusion disclosure and its likelihood to remain beyond the appointment’s end. Limitations, implications, and future directions are discussed.