Abstract

Auditory streaming is the process by which environmental sound is segregated into discrete perceptual objects. The auditory system has a remarkable capability in this regard as revealed in psychophysical experiments in humans and other primates. However, little is known about the underlying neuronal mechanisms, in part because of the lack of suitable behavioural paradigms in non-primate species. The mouse is an increasingly popular model for studying the neural mechanisms of perception and action because of the range of molecular tools enabling precise manipulation of neural circuitry. Here we present a novel behavioural task that can be used to assess perceptual aspects of auditory streaming in head-fixed mice. Animals were trained to detect a target sound in a one of two simultaneously presented, isochronous pure tone sequences. Temporal expectation was manipulated by presenting the target sound in a particular stream either early (~2 s) or late (~4 s) with respect to trial onset in blocks of 25–30 trials. Animals reached high performance on this task (d' > 1 overall), and notably their false alarms were very instructive of their behavioural state. Indeed, false alarm timing was markedly delayed for late blocks compared to early ones, indicating that the animals associated a different context to an otherwise identical stimulus. More finely, we observed that the false alarms were timed to the onset of the sounds present in the target stream. This suggests that the animals could selectively follow the target stream despite the presence of a distractor stream. Extracellular electrophysiological recordings during the task revealed that sound processing is flexibly modulated in a manner consistent with the optimisation of behavioural outcome. Together, these results indicate that the perceptual streaming can be inferred via the timing of false alarms in mice, and provide a new paradigm with which to investigate neuronal mechanisms of selective attention.

Highlights

  • In an acoustic scene comprising multiple auditory sources, humans and animals can readily identify and track a relevant sound source amongst the background noise, and switch from tracking that source to follow another (Fritz et al, 2007; Shamma et al, 2011)

  • Two auditory streams were simultaneously presented to the subject (Figure 1A); one stream was composed of high frequency tones each separated by short time intervals (High stream), and the other stream was composed of low frequency tones separated by longer time intervals (Low stream)

  • In a world where the senses are continuously stimulated, optimisation of information processing is believed crucial for perception and resulting behavioural actions(Crick, 1984; Fritz et al, 2007; Harris and Mrsic-Flogel, 2013)

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

In an acoustic scene comprising multiple auditory sources, humans and animals can readily identify and track a relevant sound source amongst the background noise, and switch from tracking that source to follow another (Fritz et al, 2007; Shamma et al, 2011) Such ease belies the complexity of the underlying processes: the auditory system must parse sounds from various sources into discrete perceptual objects (a process known as “auditory stream segregation”; Bregman, 1994), and may further enhance the representation of relevant inputs to best support behavioural needs (Crick, 1984; Fritz et al, 2007; Shamma et al, 2011). By recording neural activity in the AC of mice during ongoing behaviour, we reveal that sound processing is flexibly modulated in a manner consistent with the optimisation of behavioural outcome Future use of this behavioural paradigm combined with molecular tools to manipulate neural circuits would offer great insight on the underlying basis of auditory selective attention and streaming

RESULTS
DISCUSSION
Activity in Auditory Cortex Depends on Behavioural Context
Animals
Head-Implantation
In vivo Electrophysiology
Auditory Stimulus Presentation
Behavioural Setup
Behavioural Paradigm
Measure of Behavioural Performance
Training Protocols
Statistics
ETHICS STATEMENT
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.