Abstract

Questionnaires are widely used in routine clinical practice to assess treatment outcomes for children with anxiety disorders. This study was conducted to determine whether 2 widely used child and parent report questionnaires of child anxiety symptoms and interference (Spence Child Anxiety Scale [SCAS-C/P] and Child Anxiety Impact Scale [CAIS-C/P]) accurately identify recovery from common child anxiety disorder diagnoses as measured by a ‘gold-standard’ diagnostic interview. Three hundred thirty-seven children (7–12 years, 51% female) and their parents completed the ADIS-IV-C/P diagnostic interview and questionnaire measures (SCAS-C/P and CAIS-C/P) before (Time 1) and after (Time 2) treatment or wait-list. Time 2 parent reported interference (CAIS-P) was found to be a good predictor of absence of any diagnoses (area under the curve [AUC] = .81). In terms of specific diagnoses, Time 2 SCAS-C/P separation anxiety subscale (SCAS-C/P-SA) identified recovery from separation anxiety disorder well (SCAS-C-SA, AUC = .80; SCAS-P-SA, AUC = .82) as did the CAIS-P (AUC = .79). The CAIS-P also successfully identified recovery from social phobia (AUC = .78) and generalized anxiety disorder (AUC = .76). These AUC values were supported by moderate to good sensitivity (.70–.78) and specificity (.70–.73) at the best identified cut-off scores. None of the measures successfully identified recovery from specific phobia. The results suggest that questionnaire measures, particularly the CAIS-P, can be used to identify whether children have recovered from common anxiety disorders, with the exception of specific phobias. Cut-off scores have been identified that can guide the use of routine outcome measures in clinical practice.

Highlights

  • The remaining 178 of the children participated in an randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing child CBT (CCBT) alone versus CCBT supplemented by CBT for maternal anxiety disorder (CCBT+MCBT) or treatment focused on the mother-child interaction (CCBT+MCI) (Creswell et al, 2015)

  • Of the children diagnosed with separation anxiety disorder at Time 1, 53% were recovered from this diagnosis at Time 2

  • No measure was successful at identifying whether children recovered from their primary diagnosis, at least one of the questionnaire measures successfully identified recovery from each of the specific diagnoses considered here

Read more

Summary

Participants

Participants were 337 children aged 7-12 years (M=9.72, SD=1.55) and their primary caregivers (334 mothers, 3 fathers). 159 of the children were recruited as part of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing two guided parent-delivered cognitive behavioural treatments (GPD-CBT) of varying intensity to a wait-list control (Thirlwall et al, 2013). The remaining 178 of the children participated in an RCT comparing child CBT (CCBT) alone versus CCBT supplemented by CBT for maternal anxiety disorder (CCBT+MCBT) or treatment focused on the mother-child interaction (CCBT+MCI) (Creswell et al, 2015). Because the aim of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of self-report measures at identifying recovery from child anxiety disorders broadly, rather than in the context of a specific intervention, children from all treatment conditions across these two trials were included. Those who did and didn’t complete each measure at each time were compared on key demographic and clinical characteristics and no consistent, significant patterns were found

Procedure
Results
Discussion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call