Abstract
Professors often develop anecdotal guidelines about how each student's past performance in their academic major relates to their performance in later courses. While these guidelines can be useful, a more formal statistical analysis of these relationships can provide valuable insight into predicted student performance, which can help professors guide their students to focus on potential areas of difficulty. In addition, such analyses can identify which courses are key indicators of later performance in the major. This additional insight into the relationships between the courses in the curriculum can help professors implement curriculum changes and measure the effects of those changes. In this paper, we present the results of such an analysis for computer science majors at the U.S. Air Force Academy.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
