Abstract

Reading materials are considered having high readability if readers are interested to read the materials, understand the content of the materials and able to read the materials fluently. In contrast, reading materials with low readability discourage readers from reading the materials, create difficulties for readers to understand the content of the materials and prevent readers to read the materials fluently.

Highlights

  • Reading materials are considered having high readability if readers are interested to read the materials, understand the content of the materials and able to read the materials fluently

  • WWB Style Statistics with Support analysis tool is used because it offers numerical information and evaluation statements on average sentence length and the types of sentence used in the reading materials (S/compound sentences (Cd) and complex sentences (Cx)/compoundcomplex sentences (CdCx))

  • WWB suggests that the average sentence length (ASL) of a good piece of writing is around 18 to 26 w.p.s. and the use of S/Cd should be less than 50%, while the use of Cx/CdCx should be more than 50% but less than 70% of the whole sentences in the piece of writing (WWB Manual, 2009)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Reading materials are considered having high readability if readers are interested to read the materials, understand the content of the materials and able to read the materials fluently. In the case of the second language learners, they need to know the 3,000 high frequency words of the language (Waring & Nation, 1997) as knowing these words enable them to begin reading authentic texts (Nation, 1990; Schmitt, Schmitt & Clapham, 2001) Knowing these words, Aim of the Study This study intends to propose a more comprehensive approach to analyze reading materials so that the overall readability of the materials can be determined, but information about sentence and word difficulty as well. The scale used to measure readability is based on the US grade level scale which may not be significant to ESL learners These reasons have made the Flesch Reading Ease formula the best candidate to estimate readability of reading materials in this study.

Manual Calculation
Microsoft Word
The Composite Computational Tools for Text Analysis
The Flesch Reading Ease Formula
Estimated Reading Grade
WWB Standards
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.