Abstract
Cochlear implant (CI) listeners struggle to understand speech in background noise. Interactions between electrode channels due to current spread increase the masking of speech by noise and lead to difficulties with speech perception. Strategies that reduce channel interaction therefore have the potential to improve speech-in-noise perception by CI listeners, but previous results have been mixed. We investigated the effects of channel interaction on speech-in-noise perception and its association with spectro-temporal acuity in a listening study with 12 experienced CI users. Instead of attempting to reduce channel interaction, we introduced spectral blurring to simulate some of the effects of channel interaction by adjusting the overlap between electrode channels at the input level of the analysis filters or at the output by using several simultaneously stimulated electrodes per channel. We measured speech reception thresholds in noise as a function of the amount of blurring applied to either all 15 electrode channels or to 5 evenly spaced channels. Performance remained roughly constant as the amount of blurring applied to all channels increased up to some knee point, above which it deteriorated. This knee point differed across listeners in a way that correlated with performance on a non-speech spectro-temporal task, and is proposed here as an individual measure of channel interaction. Surprisingly, even extreme amounts of blurring applied to 5 channels did not affect performance. The effects on speech perception in noise were similar for blurring at the input and at the output of the CI. The results are in line with the assumption that experienced CI users can make use of a limited number of effective channels of information and tolerate some deviations from their everyday settings when identifying speech in the presence of a masker. Furthermore, these findings may explain the mixed results by strategies that optimized or deactivated a small number of electrodes evenly distributed along the array by showing that blurring or deactivating one-third of the electrodes did not harm speech-in-noise performance.
Highlights
Cochlear implants (CIs) provide a sense of sound for people with severe-to-profound hearing loss by electrically stimulating the auditory nerve with an array of electrodes
We evaluated the effect of spectral blurring at the input of the CI on SIN performance in twelve CI users by adjusting the spectral overlap between electrode channels
Despite the above limitations and caveats, we believe that the results found with blurring have important implications for optimization strategies for CIs with relevance to channel interaction, siteselection and speech-in-noise perception
Summary
Cochlear implants (CIs) provide a sense of sound for people with severe-to-profound hearing loss by electrically stimulating the auditory nerve with an array of electrodes. Recent studies have provided some evidence that for state-of-the-art CIs with more electrode sites than used in earlier studies, benefits still increased beyond about 8–12 channels for some device types and electrode configurations (Croghan et al 2017; Schvartz-Leyzac et al 2017; Berg et al 2019a), while this was not the case for some other types (Berg et al 2019b). These findings show that channel interaction remains an important limitation for CI hearing and that further research is required to better understand and potentially ameliorate its effects on speech-in-noise perception
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.