Abstract

The aim of this paper is, firstly, to examine the parameters which have a role in achieving privacy in using the interior domestic spaces and to what extent it influences on the way of distribution of these spaces; secondly, to investigate the relationship between house layout morphology and the privacy of inhabitants. In this paper, space syntax theory is used to examine the spatial morphology of both types (traditional and modern) house layouts in Erbil city, in order to detect the level of privacy in their configurations, through an analytical comparative approach. After a sample of house layouts has been analyzed morphologically, it has been researched as to whether the house layout pattern affects the level of privacy and to what degree. The results shows that the traditional house layouts offer better design solutions in terms of privacy because it carries a higher value of (RRA) with a higher tendency towards asymmetry structure comparing with modern house layouts. It is believed that the data that is collected will be valuable in the design process of the future house layouts at least in the city of Erbil.

Highlights

  • Robinson (2001) identified different zones of privacy within a single Midwestern house and pinpointed their importance for the individual

  • The aim of this paper is to study the morphological characteristics of spatial configurations that have a role in the distribution of interior spaces and to examine its effects on the privacy level of these spaces

  • A sample of both house layouts in Erbil City was analyzed in terms of their morphological characteristics

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Robinson (2001) identified different zones of privacy within a single Midwestern house and pinpointed their importance for the individual. The layouts of both traditional (courtyard) and modern houses are analyzed in terms of their morphological characteristics by applying Hillier and Hanson’s analysis method (Hillier and Hanson, 1988), called the Gamma Analysis method This method develops some hypotheses about the relationship between essential syntactic characteristics of spatial configuration and social variables. Analyzing diverse interpretations of human privacy shows a common core definition: It is a process that aims to control transactions between persons, and its objective is to enhance autonomy and/or minimize vulnerability From this perspective, privacy serves three main functions: limiting social interaction, establishing plans and strategies to manage interaction, and maintaining and developing self-identity (Abu-Gazzeh, 1996). Environments need to be designed that are responsive to people’s needs for both privacy and social interaction (Altman, 1975)

Objectives
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call