Abstract
The sensitivity ( d’) and bias ( c) in signal detection theory can reflect respondents’ objective performance in understanding a system and their bias towards saying yes. Thus, d’ and c can be used as alternatives of proportion correctness (PC) when evaluating drivers’ mental models of advanced driving assistance system (ADAS). The adoption of d’ and c as mental model metrics also allows cross-study comparisons as their values are independent of signal (i.e., ADAS function present) and noise (i.e., ADAS function absent) ratio. However, there is no closed-form solution of the relationships among d’, c, and PC. Hence, using numerical simulations, we extracted an empirical equation that quantifies how d’ and c can estimate PC. The equation was then validated based on participants’ responses from a survey study that targeted towards drivers’ ADAS mental model. The results show that the empirical equation reached a satisfying performance (R2 > 0.8) in estimating PC.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
