Abstract

The growing demand for access to higher education has seen institutions turn increasingly towards large classes. Implementing active, problem-based learning in this context can be difficult as it requires the lecturer to attend to every student's individual needs. Given the lack of tools for providing personalized feedback, this represents a significant challenge. The aim of this study is to see how best to support lecturers in giving timely feedback to students in a large class during problem-based learning. To meet this goal, we propose a model that combines feedforward, scaffolded using an automated summarization tool, with peer feedback. In this sense, the lecturer first provides feedforward through a series of general comments before an anonymous peer gives personalized feedback. The results show that, despite not giving personalized feedback, the lecturer is able to provide enriched formative feedforward thanks to the summary generated by the automated system. Furthermore, in more qualitative terms, the students show that they appreciate the opportunity to both give and receive feedback. Finally, the students' critical thinking skills are also shown to improve progressively from one activity to the next. Given the research gap regarding how lecturers use the reports generated by automated summarization tools, our study contributes to the literature by proposing a strategy for lecturers to use such reports to provide feedforward. Additionally, this study also contributes to the literature by proposing a model that can be fully integrated in both synchronous and asynchronous online learning.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call