Abstract
Agency theory is the dominant explanation for entrepreneurs’ decisions about how much to grow through franchising vis–à–vis company ownership. We introduce a resource–based explanation and submit that the proportion franchised is influenced by efforts to organize franchisor–owned and relational strategic assets so that their value can be best leveraged to meet key strategic goals. Using data from 168 franchisors, we found that relational (i.e., interfirm trust and knowledge–sharing routines), but not franchisor–owned (i.e., brand reputation and operating routines), strategic assets influence the proportion franchised. The study offers preliminary evidence that resource–based theory has merit as a complementary explanation for franchising.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
