Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Adolescents in low and middle-income countries experience pronounced mental health needs in contexts where infrastructure and resources are scarce. While evidence-based treatment are readily available, they may not fit the unique needs of certain contexts. Objective This manuscript illustrates the systematic process of applying ‘relevance mapping’ methodology to leverage the youth mental health evidence base to identify candidate practices for inclusion in the development of a contextually appropriate psychological treatment protocol for common adolescent mental health problems in India. Methods The practice identification was informed by two datasets obtained from adolescent samples in India. The first was an epidemiological dataset from a large community sample in Goa (N = 2,048); the second incorporated ‘youth top problems’ reported by service-seeking students presenting to school counsellors in Goa and Delhi (N = 78). Problems identified in each dataset were categorized using structured codes. Problem codes and youth demographics were then indexed against a database of hundreds of evidence-based psychological treatments and their associated clinical trials. This methodology revealed the most common practice elements (discrete therapeutic strategies) and their most efficient combinations with evidence of effectiveness matching the demographics and diagnostic category (anxiety, disruptive behaviors and depression) prevalent in the planned treatment population. Results For anxiety, the most common practice elements for this age group were exposure, cognitive coping, and psychoeducation. For disruptive behaviors, the most common practices were problem-solving, goal-setting, and rapport-building. For depression, cognitive coping, behavioral activation, and psychoeducation were the most common practice elements. Conclusion These practice elements provided the treatment development team with a preliminary list of candidate content for the development of an intensive psychological treatment within a stepped care service model to address common adolescent mental health problems in schools in India.

Highlights

  • Adolescents in low and middle-income countries experience pronounced mental health needs in contexts where infrastructure and resources are scarce

  • Low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) experi­ ence pronounced mental health burdens, where needs are vast, resources are scarce, and stigma is high [1]. This is compounded by the scarcity of contextspecific intervention research, with most evidencebased treatments (EBTs) evaluated in high-income countries, under conditions that include robust infra­ structure and delivery by trained workforces with access to expert supervision [2]

  • There are concerns about the applicability, scalability, and sus­ tainability of EBTs transported into low-resource set­ tings, along with the acceptability of treatments developed in western countries when applied in con­ texts with different cultural beliefs around mental health [3]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Adolescents in low and middle-income countries experience pronounced mental health needs in contexts where infrastructure and resources are scarce. Problem codes and youth demographics were indexed against a database of hundreds of evidence-based psychological treatments and their associated clinical trials This metho­ dology revealed the most common practice elements (discrete therapeutic strategies) and their most efficient combinations with evidence of effectiveness matching the demo­ graphics and diagnostic category (anxiety, disruptive behaviors and depression) prevalent in the planned treatment population. Calls for robust interventions for low-resource settings have led to a focus on designing interven­ tions in public health contexts [4] This approach differs from the strategy of selecting and adapting a single existing EBT and instead assembles the intervention from available components, jointly considering the local context and relevant evidence base [5,6].

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call