Abstract

Seed rules and regulations determine who can produce and sell seeds, which varieties will be available in the market, the quality of seed for sale, and where seed can be bought and sold. The legal and regulatory environment for seed impacts all stakeholders, including those in the informal sector, through shaping who can participate in the market and the quality and diversity of seed available. This paper addresses a gap in the current literature regarding the role of law and regulation in linking the informal and formal seed sectors and creating more inclusive and better governed seed systems. Drawing upon insights from the literature, global case studies, key expert consultations, and a methodology on the design and implementation of law and regulation, we present a framework that evaluates how regulatory flexibility can be built into seed systems to address farmers’ needs and engage stakeholders of all sizes. Our study focuses on two key dimensions: extending market frontiers and liberalizing seed quality control mechanisms. We find that flexible regulatory approaches and practices play a central role in building bridges between formal and informal seed systems, guaranteeing quality seed in the market, and encouraging market entry for high-quality traditional and farmer-preferred varieties.

Highlights

  • Regulatory flexibility may take the form of different rules for different types of business, rules designed to address the needs of a certain group, or some other differentiation [15] that appears in the context of regulatory design or implementation

  • This study presented a framework that evaluates how regulatory flexibility can be built into seed systems to engage farmers of all sizes

  • We focused on two study dimensions: (i) extending market frontiers and (ii) liberalizing seed quality control mechanisms (ranging from formal seed certification to quality declared seed (QDS) and self-certification)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In order to be inclusive, a seed system should allow for stakeholders of all sizes to participate in the market, including both commercial companies and small farmers, and should promote both commercially attractive crops (e.g., hybrid maize) and other crops desired by farmers and local communities, including open pollinated and vegetatively propagated crops

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call