Abstract

While well-defined urban property rights to support land and financial markets are widely considered to be essential for economic development, many studies using household-based data to study titling programs’ impact yield inconclusive results. We use a 2010–13 titling program in Maseru to argue that this may partly be attributable to a failure of using administrative data and the fact that impacts of policy change that affect treatment and control are not identified in a standard difference in differences (DID) approach. Registry data show significant and sustained changes in quality of service delivery; female land ownership; and volume of registered land sales and mortgages due to the project. Econometric analysis supports this and points to significant effects of regulatory reform. We use this as a basis to discuss ways of combining registry and household survey data to better analyze this type of interventions.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.