Using Qualitative Research to Inform the Client-Centred Evidence-Based Practice of Occupational Therapy

Abstract

Demands for increased accountability for health care expenditure, and recognition of clients' rights to interventions and methods of service delivery that are grounded in sound evidence, are compelling occupational therapists to use research findings to inform their clinical decision making. Occupational therapists also state that they embrace a client-centred orientation to practice, yet this espoused ethic seems rarely to influence decisions concerning what research is undertaken and how it is undertaken or what counts as evidence for practice. Given the widely divergent perspectives, priorities and values between health care professionals and their clients, practice based upon therapist-centred research may be neither relevant nor valid. This paper explores the philosophical underpinning of methods used to develop theory, proposing that occupational therapy's evidence-based practice must be ethically consistent with its espoused client-centred philosophy to avoid a tendency towards hypocrisy. It explores issues concerning client-centred practice and evidence-based practice and suggests that qualitative research methods may be the most appropriate tools to identify and address client priorities. While traditional quantitative research approaches render client voices silent, qualitative methods may enable occupational therapists to explore the complexities of clinical practice and of living with a disability, thereby informing a more client-centred, evidence-based practice of occupational therapy.