Abstract

A criticism of Medicare’s home health prospective payment system is its partial reliance on cost-based reimbursement of therapy services provided by home health agencies (HHAs) to Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) beneficiaries, potentially overincentivizing the provision of therapy services. Using Medicare FFS home health claims and assessment data, we estimated a model to predict therapy use as a proxy for clinical need and replace actual therapy use with the prediction in the home health payment system. We estimated a $1.178 billion (95% confidence interval, $1.171-$1.184) decrease in home health payments relative to levels under the current system. The majority of the decrease was due to the model predicting fewer high therapy episodes than actually occurred. It may therefore be more appropriate to predict both therapy and nontherapy use, requiring an overhaul of the current system.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.