Using Polymers to Impart Lubricity and Biopassivity to Surfaces: Are These Properties Linked?

Abstract

AbstractPolymer brushes have been widely applied for the reduction of both friction and non‐specific protein adsorption. In many (but not all) applications, such as contact lenses or medical devices, this combination of properties is highly desirable. Indeed, for many polymer‐brush systems, lubricity and resistance to biofouling appear to go hand in hand, with modifications of brush architecture, for example, leading to a similar degree of enhancement (or degradation) in both properties. In the case of poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) brushes, this has been widely demonstrated. There are, however, examples where this behavior breaks down. In systems where linear brushes are covalently crosslinked during surface‐initiated polymerization (SIP), for example, the presence and the chemical nature of links between grafted chains might or might not influence biopassivity of the films, while it always causes an increment in friction. Furthermore, when the grafted‐chain topology is shifted from linear to cyclic, chemically identical brushes show a substantial improvement in lubrication, whereas their protein resistance remains unaltered. Architectural control of polymer brush films can provide another degree of freedom in the design of lubricious and biopassive coatings, leading to new combinations of surface properties and their independent modulation.