Using physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modeling to assess the efficacy of glove materials in reducing internal doses and potential hazards of N-methylpyrrolidone during paint stripping

Abstract

A refined risk assessment was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of different glove materials in reducing the potential hazards associated with using paint strippers containing N-methylpyrrolidone (NMP) under the scenarios defined by USEPA’s TSCA risk assessment. Three categories of gloves were identified based on measured permeation rates for NMP: (1) minimal protection; (2) moderate protection; and (3) maximal protection. Simulations for eight acute and chronic occupational exposure scenarios identified by USEPA as having a potential hazard (i.e., margins of exposure, MOE, <30) were reassessed for each glove category using PBPK modeling to predict peak (Cmax) and cumulative (AUC) internal doses of NMP. For the acute assessment, the refined MOE values were ≥30 for half of the scenarios for gloves from the moderate protection group category, and all of the scenarios for gloves from the maximal protection category. For the chronic assessment, the refined MOE values were ≥30 for all scenarios except one for gloves from the maximal protection category. The results of this assessment indicate that: (1) the degree of protection provided by gloves from NMP permeation can vary widely depending upon the glove material, NMP formulation, and internal dose measure (with calculated glove protection factors ranging from 1.1 to 1900); and (2) NMP-containing paint strippers can be used safely when appropriate PPE are used. As such, these results can be used to support risk-reduction methods (e.g., product labeling, MSDS instructions on use of appropriate glove materials) as alternatives to banning NMP use under TSCA.