Abstract

Emerging infectious diseases of zoonotic origin constitute a recurrent threat to global health. Nonhuman primates (NHPs) occupy an important place in zoonotic spillovers (pathogenic transmissions from animals to humans), serving as reservoirs or amplifiers of multiple neglected tropical diseases, including viral hemorrhagic fevers and arboviruses, parasites and bacteria, as well as retroviruses (simian foamy virus, PTLV) that are pathogenic in human beings. Hunting and butchering studies in Africa characterize at-risk human social groups, but overlook critical factors of contact heterogeneity and frequency, NHP species differences, and meat processing practices. In southeastern Cameroon, a region with a history of zoonotic emergence and high risk of future spillovers, we conducted a novel mixed-method field study of human physical exposure to multiple NHP species, incorporating participant-based and ecological methodologies, and qualitative interviews (n = 25). We find frequent physical contact across adult human populations, greater physical contact with monkeys than apes, especially for meat handling practices, and positive correlation of human exposure with NHP species abundance and proximity to human settlement. These fine-grained results encourage reconsideration of the likely dynamics of human-NHP contact in past and future NTD emergence events. Multidisciplinary social science and ecological approaches should be mobilized to generate more effective human and animal surveillance and risk communications around neglected tropical diseases. At a moment when the WHO has included “Disease X”, a presumably zoonotic pathogen with pandemic potential, on its list of blueprint priority diseases as, new field-based tools for investigating zoonotic disease emergence, both known and unknown, are of critical importance.

Highlights

  • Zoonotic diseases constitute over 60% of emerging infectious diseases (EIDs), a major threat to global health [1,2,3,4]

  • Previous studies have focused on hunting and butchering of primates as risky practices that expose central Africans to their diseases. These studies have not investigated how different kinds and frequencies of contact or the abundance of different monkey and great ape species affect these risks. We examined these factors in southeastern Cameroon, conducting a social sciences study of human physical contacts with nine different primate species

  • We found that Cameroonian adults had frequent physical contact with primates, and more with monkeys than apes, especially through handling meat for butchering, marketing, and preparation

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Zoonotic diseases constitute over 60% of emerging infectious diseases (EIDs), a major threat to global health [1,2,3,4]. Of these EIDs of zoonotic origin, 70% reportedly come from wild animals [5,6]. Multiple factors, including genetic proximity between hosts, the adaptive ability of a pathogen, and human physical contact with NHPs and their bodily fluids are drivers of zoonotic transmissions [16,17]. Physical contact has constituted a particular focus for studies of zoonotic transmission, because certain past spillovers, including multiple hemorrhagic fevers, have emerged from human physical exposure to NHP biological fluids. Understanding the complex interactions of human and animal factors that facilitate this physical contact and zoonotic transmission calls for a multi-disciplinary social sciences and ecological approaches [25,26,27,28,29]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call