Using pharmacy technicians and electronic health record capabilities to improve outcomes for patients with cardiovascular disease

Abstract

ObjectiveThis study aimed to compare lipid and blood pressure (BP) control before and after implementing a certified pharmacy technician (CPhT) protocol that optimized electronic health record (EHR) capabilities and shifted work from clinical pharmacy specialists (CPSs) to CPhT. SettingKaiser Permanente Colorado’s pharmacist-managed cardiac risk reduction service (which manages dyslipidemia, hypertension, and diabetes for all patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease). Practice descriptionIn 2019, a protocol that optimized EHR capabilities and allowed work to be offloaded from CPS to CPhT was implemented. Filtered views within the EHR were created that bucketed patients with specific lipid results criteria. The CPhT protocol provided guidance to CPhT on determining whether patients were at low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and non–high-density lipoprotein (non-HDL) goals, on appropriate statin intensity, adherent to medications, and whether the most recent BP was controlled. The CPhT notified CPS of uncontrolled patients who would assess and manage these patients, as necessary. The CPhT notified controlled patients of their results. Practice innovationData on the outcomes of incorporating pharmacy technicians to support CPS clinical activities in ambulatory clinical pharmacy are limited. Evaluation dethodsThis retrospective study compared a “Pharmacist-Driven” (index date: January 1, 2016) with a “Tech-Enhanced” (index date: January 1, 2019) group. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients at all goals defined as LDL-C < 70 mg/dL, non-HDL < 100 mg/dL, and BP < 140/90 mm Hg at 1 year after the index dates. ResultsThere were 6813 patients included (mean age: 70.2 ± 11.1 years, 71.4% male): 3130 and 3683 in the “Pharmacist-Driven” and “Tech-Enhanced” groups, respectively. The proportion of patients who attained LDL-C, non-HDL, and BP goals was higher in the “Tech-Enhanced” group (51.1% vs. 39.7%, P < 0.001) than the “Pharmacist-Driven” group. ConclusionA protocol integrating EHR decision support and CPhTs enabled work to shift to from CPS to CPhT and improved clinical outcomes.