Abstract

Global cultural heritage is threatened by the increasing frequency and severity of natural disasters caused by climate change. International experts emphasise the importance of managing cultural heritage sustainably as part of a paradigm shift in cultural heritage perception, understanding, and management. This paradigm shift has stimulated a need to integrate cultural heritage into pre-existing disaster risk management governance. However, there is currently a lack of robust and practical approaches to map the complex nature of disaster risk management governance. It is here considered that a shared understanding of the respective roles and responsibilities of the different organisations involved in risk management is a critical element in improving the preparedness of cultural heritage sites. The purpose of this article is to present the utility of the Organigraph technique and its main components as a tool to map governance structures, identify key stakeholders, and integrate cultural heritage experts into wider disaster risk management. The article presents a semi-empirical research approach, consisting of four iterative phases in which a series of digital workshops, semi-structured meetings, and bilateral expert meetings were used to co-produce five Organigraphs for heritage sites participating in an ongoing European Project. Our findings suggest that Organigraphs provide a valuable tool at the disposal of practitioners and academics with the potential to provide a basis for cross-national, cross-issue, and cross-scale peer learning between heritage sites. Furthermore, the technique is a valuable self-diagnostic tool to facilitate learning and proactive discussions in the preparedness phase of disaster risk management. Finally, they facilitate the co-creation of solutions through an evolving, interactive platform to integrate data-driven approaches.

Highlights

  • The Organigraph technique provided a simple yet effective tool for a group of interdisciplinary stakeholders to map and explore their disaster risk management (DRM) governance structures, by highlighting the key stakeholder groups, their relationships and governance mechanisms using a standardised set of shapes, colours, and lines arranged on an interactive digital whiteboard

  • DRM governance structures can be mapped, compared, and explored regardless of their context or subjective variables. This provides a mechanism for the mapping and exploration of DRM governance, which may in turn aid in the operationalisation of the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction (SFDRR)

  • The potential of the Organigraph technique can be maximised through the use of a transdisciplinary semi-empirical approach in which a transdisciplinary stakeholders can come together to discuss and co-produce a map of the DRM governance

Read more

Summary

Introduction

There is an ongoing paradigm shift within the cultural heritage (CH) discourse [1,2,3]. This shift has, in part, been stimulated by the perceived vulnerability of the worlds CH to the increasing frequency and severity of natural disasters driven by the effects of climate change [4,5]. One aspect of which is the mutually beneficial integration of CH into disaster risk management (DRM) and its ability to enhance the resilience of CH [10,11] Within this shifting paradigm, international institutions such as UNESCO, ICCROM, and

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call