Abstract

Climate change threats make it difficult to perform reliable and quick predictions on floods forecasting. This gives rise to the need of having advanced methods, e.g., computational intelligence tools, to improve upon the results from flooding events simulations and, in turn, design best practices for riverbed maintenance. In this context, being able to accurately estimate the roughness coefficient, also known as Manning’s n coefficient, plays an important role when computational models are employed. In this piece of research, we propose an optimal approach for the estimation of ‘n’. First, an objective function is designed for measuring the quality of ‘candidate’ Manning’s coefficients relative to specif cross-sections of a river. Second, such function is optimised to return coefficients having the highest quality as possible. Five well-known meta-heuristic algorithms are employed to achieve this goal, these being a classic Evolution Strategy, a Differential Evolution algorithm, the popular Covariance Matrix Adaptation Evolution Strategy, a classic Particle Swarm Optimisation and a Bayesian Optimisation framework. We report results on two real-world case studies based on the Italian rivers ‘Paglia’ and ‘Aniene’. A comparative analysis between the employed optimisation algorithms is performed and discussed both empirically and statistically. From the hydrodynamic point of view, the experimental results are satisfactory and produced within significantly less computational time in comparison to classic methods. This shows the suitability of the proposed approach for optimal estimation of the roughness coefficient and, in turn, for designing optimised hydrological models.

Highlights

  • To ‘ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all’ is one of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) targeted by the United Nations

  • Since the fitness values provided in the tables are the estimation errors in meters, the accuracy gain obtained by the proposed automatic methodology is of more than 1.5 m with respect to the standard approach in both the case studies, even considering the worst execution of the less effective meta-heuristic

  • The worst error obtained by execution of (1 + 1)-Evolution Strategies (ESs) is of just 0.021 cm—in the Aniene case study, see Table 2, making (1 + 1)-ES the algorithm to go for practitioners that want to consider our methodology for future works in flood analysis

Read more

Summary

Introduction

To ‘ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all’ is one of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) targeted by the United Nations. Since its launch in 2015, this goal (i.e., SDG 6), assumed a wider focus and already in 2018 it was agreed that all aspects of the water cycle, being of paramount importance for development, should be considered and embedded directly and indirectly in all the remaining 17 SDGs [1]. In this context, hydraulic models are of pivotal importance to support the progress in achieving multiple SDGs. In this context, hydraulic models are of pivotal importance to support the progress in achieving multiple SDGs The latter find their place in several fields of application having key implications on sustainable management of water sources [2], preserving the environment [3] and mitigating climate changes [4]. Models worth mentioning are those capable of characterising floods through sediment transport and analysis [9,10], used to develop flood protection systems [11], and those generating flooding maps, simulating drainage channels and water temperatures [12,13,14]

Objectives
Methods
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call