Abstract

For carbon capture and storage technology to successfully contribute to climate mitigation efforts, the stored CO2 must be securely isolated from the atmosphere and oceans. Hence, there is a need to establish and verify monitoring techniques that can detect unplanned migration of injected CO2 from a storage site to the near surface. Noble gases are sensitive tracers of crustal fluid input in the subsurface due to their low concentrations and unreactive nature. Several studies have identified their potential to act as tracers of deep fluid migration to the shallow subsurface, but they have yet to be used in a contested situation. In January 2011 it was reported extensively in global media that high CO2 concentrations in soils and related groundwater pollution had been identified on a farm property belonging to the Kerr family, located near to the town of Weyburn in Saskatchewan, Canada. The origin of this CO2 pollution was cited to be the nearby Weyburn-Midale CO2 Monitoring and Storage Project. Here, as part of an investigation funded independently of the Weyburn-Midale field operators, we present δ13CDIC, 3He/4He, 4He/20Ne, 20Ne, 36Ar, 40Ar and Kr measured in waters obtained from four groundwater wells located on and surrounding the Kerr property. We aim to establish if stable carbon and noble gas natural tracers are effective at determining if migration of CO2 from the storage project was responsible for the alleged high CO2 concentrations and water pollution measured on the Kerr farm. We compare the stable carbon isotope and noble gas ‘fingerprints’ of the Kerr groundwaters to those expected in a water equilibrated with the atmosphere under local recharge conditions, the produced CO2 obtained from production wells, and the CO2 injected into the Weyburn and Midale oil fields. We find that the stable carbon isotope data do not constrain the origin of the dissolved CO2 in the Kerr groundwaters. Due to low noble gas concentrations in the captured CO2 we are unable to completely rule out the presence of 20–34% contribution from injected CO2 to the groundwaters surrounding the Kerr property. However, we find that all of the Kerr groundwater samples exhibit noble gas fingerprints that would be expected in a shallow groundwater in contact with the atmosphere and hence there is no evidence for the addition of a deep radiogenic component or dilution from the addition of a gas phase low in atmospheric derived noble gases. Our findings corroborate previous studies that indicate that elevated CO2 concentrations found on the Kerr property are almost certainly of biological origin, and not migrated from the deep subsurface. The comprehensive follow up to these CO2 leakage allegations outlined in this study provides a robust framework for responses to any future leakage allegations at CO2 storage sites and further highlights that no single technique can categorically identify the origin of CO2 in the shallow subsurface. Hence, it is essential that the full range of geochemical tracers (stable carbon and 14C isotopes, noble gases, water chemistry, process based gas ratios) are integrated with a good understanding of geological and engineering data in response to CO2 leakage allegations in the future.

Highlights

  • For Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) technology to be routinely deployed evidence is required that large volumes of CO2 can be injected into the subsurface and securely retained

  • Our results show that all of the noble gas concentrations and isotope ratios measured in the Kerr shallow groundwater samples are within the calculated Air Saturated Water (ASW) ranges, bar those of 20Ne/22Ne and a single sample which plots below the ASW range of 20Ne and 36Ar (Thackeray House Well)

  • We conclude that the carbon isotope data do not constrain the origin of elevated dissolved CO2 concentrations in the Kerr groundwaters, due to the lack of a distinct fingerprint between the injected and produced CO2 relative to that of baseline values in the shallow subsurface in the region

Read more

Summary

Introduction

For Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) technology to be routinely deployed evidence is required that large volumes of CO2 can be injected into the subsurface and securely retained. This evidence base can only be provided through evaluation of the containment performance of both natural CO2 reservoirs (Miocic et al, 2013, 2016) and through the evaluation of the security of engineered CO2 storage sites (Wolaver et al, 2013). 2.4 Mt/year and 0.4 Mt/year of CO2 are injected into the Weyburn and Midale oil fields, respectively, and it is intended that in excess of 40 Mt of CO2 will be stored in the fields in total (IEA Greenhouse Gas Programme, 2004)

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.