Using Multiple Databases to Produce Comprehensive Follow-Up in an Effort to Enhance Evaluation of Outcome Measurements: Surgical Ablation (Maze) Exemplar

Abstract

Improving outcomes is a central theme in the national healthcare reform discussions and the ongoing debate centers on ways to limit escalating costs while maintaining excellent patient outcomes. Facilities need to be able to make sense of their "numbers," implement appropriate change in practice, evaluate the impact of this change, and understand what the new numbers are really conveying to the public. The need for a dynamic, longitudinal data system that allows rapid response to new insights and discoveries must be available on a local level. Atrial fibrillation, an electrical conduction disorder of the heart that carries significant morbidity with its onset, is a chronic condition that currently affects over 2 million people in the United States. Our institute has performed over 450 surgeries for atrial fibrillation and is one of the few facilities nationwide that offers surgery for atrial fibrillation. As an exemplar, we describe our experience with the establishment of a database process that links hospital databases together as well as creates a patient's longitudinal record of follow-up that includes later events, interventions, and outcomes out to 5 years. Furthermore, we discuss how these data have changed our practice and go beyond the reporting of just numbers.